Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHerman
dc.contributor.authorMurni, Sri Minda
dc.contributor.authorSibarani, Berlin
dc.contributor.authorSaragih, Amrin
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-17T05:50:51Z
dc.date.available2019-12-17T05:50:51Z
dc.date.issued2019-12
dc.identifier.citationBaldry, A. and Thibault, P. J. (2006).Multimodal transcription and text analysis. London: Equinox; Bogdan, R. C. and Biklen, K. (1998).Qualitative research for education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold; Herman. (2014). An experiential function on students’ genre of writing. Jakarta: Halaman Moeka; Herman, et. al. (2019). Multimodal Analysis on “Samsung Galaxy S5” Print Advertisement. International Proceeding. 3rd Nommensen International Conference on Technology and Engineering (3rd NICTE) 2019; Hu, C and Luo, M. (2016).A social semiotic analysis of air France’s print advertisements. International Journal of English Linguistics; Vol. 6, No. 4; 2016.Canadian Center of Science and Education; Koentjaraningrat.(1990). Kebudayaan Jawa. Jakarta: PN Balai Pustaka; Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope, & M. Kalanzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182–202). London: Routledge; Kress, G. (2003).Literacy in the new media age . London: Routledge; Kress, G. And Van Leeuwen, T. (2006).Reading images. London: Routledge; Lubis, D.S. and Sinar, T. S. (2014).The structure of selected print advertisement: Amultimodal analysis.Kajian Linguistik, Februari 2014, 161-177, Tahun ke-11, No. 1. Copyright ©2014, Program Studi Linguistik FIB USU, ISSN 1693-4660; Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction. New York: Routledge.; O’Halloran, K. L. (Ed.) (2004).Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functionalperspectives. London: Continuum.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2201-1323
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.uhn.ac.id/handle/123456789/3629
dc.description.abstractThis research discusses structures of representational metafunctions in the Chinese cultural ceremony known as Cheng Beng. The visual multimodal components were the primary focus since the culture of the Cheng Beng ceremony was dominated by visual aspects showing the process of conducting the ceremony. The methodology used in this research was the descriptive qualitative approach. The visual data sources were obtained from four phases in conducting Cheng Beng, with twenty-five pictures for every metafunction of visual communication. After applying the analysis to the data, the researcher found that structures of representational multimodal metafunctions used in the Cheng Beng ceremony in Pematangsiantar applied: the actional process (actor and goal) and reactional process (reactor and phenomenon) with the circumstances (locative and means).en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of HKBP Nommensen (UHN) Medanen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPrimrose Hall Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. 8;Issue 4
dc.subjectMetafunction, multimodal, representational, structure, visual component.en_US
dc.titleStructures of Representational Metafunctions of the “Cheng Beng” Ceremony in Pematangsiantar: A Multimodal Analysisen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record